think tank forum

would everyone be happy with textile for post formatting?

YES!

yes.

yup

oh yes

until it's implemented here, you can use ciew.org as a sandbox. rot13 password: trvereg

Yes!

So, I can't seem to edit anything and save with that password bluet, where is the sandbox action?

p.s. this looks awesome: http://ciew.org/skoleting/hisfil/Machiavelli

here's a sandbox: http://www.textism.com/tools/textile/

here as well

I know the textism site, I just wanted to see bluet's implementation.

Thanks lucas/bluet

my link was aimed at everyone as a bluet-sandbox-replacement.

dannyp: did you decrypt the password with rot13?

http://code.google.com/p/thinktankforums/source/detail?r=310

ok, i've begun working on it. i don't want to allow as much as TextileThis(), but i want to allow more than TextileRestricted().

how about support for these?

-----

phrase modifiers
_emphasis_
*strong*
??citation??
^superscript^
~subscript~
@code@

block modifiers (with extended block support)
bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph
bc. Block code
pre. Pre-formatted
# Numeric list
* Bulleted list

links
"linktext":url

punctuation
"quotes" → “quotes”
'quotes' → ‘quotes’
it's → it’s
em -- dash → em — dash
en - dash → en – dash
2 x 4 → 2 × 4
foo(tm) → foo™
foo(r) → foo®
foo(c) → foo©

-----

i'm weary of the en- and em-dash markup. i like how latex does a hyphen for -, an en for --, and an em for ---. how does textile know the difference between a hyphen and an en-dash?

good question. I don't think you should do the dashes anyway. people have the means of typing those in on their keyboards one way or another anyway. same with the copyright/trademark things. I guess the proper quotation marks are nice though. none of that stuff is essential though.

i think these are essential.

-----

phrase modifiers
_emphasis_
*strong*
??citation??
^superscript^
~subscript~
@code@

block modifiers (with extended block support)
bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph
bc. Block code
pre. Pre-formatted

links
"linktext":url