http://www.bildirgec.org/yazi/22-adet-web-onderi-ucretsiz (turkish)
http://bloggingbits.com/22-free-forum-softwar … mmunities/ (english)
wikipedia is apparently raising the standards on notability. this sucks because i used to rely on wikipedia lists for a comprehensive market search.
ouch
http://s3.wingedleopard.net/lucas/static/wikipedia_ttf.png
> wikipedia lists for a comprehensive market search.
No, it's not.
There is just a small but very active group of people who have a "vision" of what wikipedia should be and delete everything that's not conforming to that.
The wikipedia community is rotten (Not just because of this btw.)
"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.
(wikipedia)
while the sources don't say much about ttf, there isn't much to say about it. they may be seen as trivial, but being listed by a handful of people as in the top twenty of web forum software is non-trivial to me.
think tank forums
There are many forums on the web, some good, some not so good. IMHO, think tank forums are amongst the best. They are clean, simple and very easy to use. Good stuff.
(source)
also a nice, fair review:
Great Open Source Forum
Overall rating: 3.9
Functionality: 5.0
Usability: 5.0
Security: 4.0
Performance & Scalability: 3.0
Architecture & Quality: 5.0
Support & Documentation: 1.0
Adoption & Community: 1.0
Reviewed by Guest
November 02, 2007
This board is fast, and very usable. It's driven by functionality and utility. The form fits the quality of the functionality. There is little documentation, but it should be reasonably clear to an experienced php/mysql administrator. I feel that the only downside is that the forum may not scale well with many users on larger boards.
(source)
damn amnesia from clonazepam!
Deleted, disputed, restored, deleted by another zealot again.
Never mind this was one of the most advanced games of it's time and even though it was never very well known it influenced many later games.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoo has a zealot community of it's own, so that page stays.
Wikipedia sucks.
done!
www.ttfproject.com
this domain expires on 18-march-2010, at which point piranha-squatters can waste their money on it.
http://www.cramster.com/reference/wiki.aspx?w … ank_Forums
http://www.cramster.com/reference/wiki.aspx?w … rnet_forum
weird
it'd be cool if there was a site like wikipedia where everything must cite sources, but they don't need to meet some arbitrary notability threshold.